<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: GIT vs. SVN: 1 : 0</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.experimentalworks.net/2008/07/git-vs-svn-1-0/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.experimentalworks.net/2008/07/git-vs-svn-1-0/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 27 Jan 2012 13:31:16 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.3</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Derek Mahar</title>
		<link>http://blog.experimentalworks.net/2008/07/git-vs-svn-1-0/comment-page-1/#comment-35</link>
		<dc:creator>Derek Mahar</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 26 Jul 2008 22:38:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wp.experimentalworks.net/?p=69#comment-35</guid>
		<description>After scanning the manpages for *git log*, I was amazed at how many options it provides for controling the Git repository search experience and formating the log output.  Git never ceases to amaze me!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>After scanning the manpages for *git log*, I was amazed at how many options it provides for controling the Git repository search experience and formating the log output.  Git never ceases to amaze me!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Derek Mahar</title>
		<link>http://blog.experimentalworks.net/2008/07/git-vs-svn-1-0/comment-page-1/#comment-34</link>
		<dc:creator>Derek Mahar</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 26 Jul 2008 22:30:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wp.experimentalworks.net/?p=69#comment-34</guid>
		<description>Thank you for the post.  I was unaware of this Git search feature.  Does *git log -S* search both git commit comments as well as the textual differences?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thank you for the post.  I was unaware of this Git search feature.  Does *git log -S* search both git commit comments as well as the textual differences?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: dsp</title>
		<link>http://blog.experimentalworks.net/2008/07/git-vs-svn-1-0/comment-page-1/#comment-33</link>
		<dc:creator>dsp</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Jul 2008 09:23:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wp.experimentalworks.net/?p=69#comment-33</guid>
		<description>Did you tried git reflog. As long as there is a reference in git reflog the stashed commit can be accessed and not removed by git gc. Even without a reflog you might try to search for dangling objects using git fsck.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Did you tried git reflog. As long as there is a reference in git reflog the stashed commit can be accessed and not removed by git gc. Even without a reflog you might try to search for dangling objects using git fsck.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lars Strojny</title>
		<link>http://blog.experimentalworks.net/2008/07/git-vs-svn-1-0/comment-page-1/#comment-32</link>
		<dc:creator>Lars Strojny</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Jul 2008 23:22:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wp.experimentalworks.net/?p=69#comment-32</guid>
		<description>The other side of the story is, that a fucked up stash sent one week of my work to nirvana recently. But yes, generally it works more than fine.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The other side of the story is, that a fucked up stash sent one week of my work to nirvana recently. But yes, generally it works more than fine.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

